Search for: "Matter of McConnell" Results 381 - 400 of 1,107
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2020, 7:34 am by Zoe Gujral
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has indicated that he will not support it. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The outcome represented a political triumph for the White House and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who successfully held together nearly the entire GOP caucus in blocking witnesses or additional evidence from the proceedings. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 12:52 pm by Sandy Levinson
  At least since the election of 1800 (and, as a matter of fact, in 1796, that has been an altogether dubious proposition. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 9:48 am by Philip Bobbitt
Dershowitz goes on: Why then would a nonpartisan agency get it so wrong as a matter of constitutional law. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 3:13 am by Jackie McDermott
He also added that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and the minority leader would do well to come to agreements on procedural issues. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 7:18 am by Bob Bauer
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has argued for broadly restrictive conditions on impeachment. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am by Jonathan Shaub
But McConnell’s desired process would implicitly make an important concession about the evidence against the president. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:34 am by Marty Lederman
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit didn't, as a formal legal matter, result in any coercive judgment against anyone: No party is subject to any judicial decree, and no one is legally obligated to alter their behavior, as a result. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 9:18 am by David Post
If Mitch McConnell can hold the Senate Republicans together, we—and by "we" I mean the American people—will have heard from none of them, under oath, about any of this. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 8:18 am by Frank Bowman
But as matters stand, every question ultimately rests in the unguided, and inevitably politically driven, discretion of a majority of senators. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 5:46 am by Philip Bobbitt
There is no reason why a resolution of this matter cannot be handled with dispatch by the judiciary. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 7:04 am by Scott R. Anderson, Margaret Taylor
This guarantees that the sponsors of such measures will be able to force at least one round of debate and a Senate-wide vote—outcomes that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell would otherwise most likely be able to prevent under normal Senate procedures. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:41 pm by Sandy Levinson
  Even though Trump is no Hitler, I do think that McConnell and his crew are in fact worse than Fritz van Papen was in 1933. [read post]
4 Jan 2020, 10:22 am by Tom Smith
In an interview with Hugh Hewitt on Dec. 18, McConnell said, “One of every four of the U.S. circuit judges in the country have been put on the bench in the last three years. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 4:23 am
Pelosi risks appearing to politicize the matter if she withholds the charges for negotiating leverage.Risks appearing to politicize.... oh, come on! [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 3:56 am by SHG
Whether McConnell wants to change the rules is another matter. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 3:05 am by SHG
Tribe can turn the question on its head, for all it matters. [read post]