Search for: "Matter of Stanford" Results 381 - 400 of 2,852
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2014, 1:47 pm by Jennifer Lee
”  A connection matters where the misrepresentation makes a significant difference to someone’s decision to purchase or sell a covered security, not to purchase or sell an uncovered security. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 7:01 am
Now let me ask two men while they're versed in the law to give me a laymen's education in this matter. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm by Legal Aggregate
The event was co-sponsored by the Stanford Center for Racial Justice and the Stanford Constitutional Law Center. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 7:37 pm by Amanda Frost
   That interesting question is addressed by Brian Goldman in his forthcoming Stanford Law Review note, now available on ssrn here. [read post]
Board of Education, Stanford Law School’s Ralph Richard Banks, the Jackson Eli Reynolds Professor of Law, joined a recent episode of the Stanford Legal podcast to discuss the legacy of one of the most celebrated Supreme Court cases. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 6:49 am
Over the weekend, I attended a thought-provoking conference put on by the Discrimination Research Group, graciously hosted by Deborah Rhode at Stanford. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 5:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Human Cells and the Strange Effects of Property and Intellectual Property Law (Stanford Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 7:27 am by Eran Kahana
When I wrote “Germinating Seeds of Agency – Part I” in July 2010, I concluded by noting: It is inevitable and only a matter of (a short) time that in this reimagined reality [the virtual reality], the use of some avatars will transcend the aquarium-like current environment in which virtual worlds exist. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 4:25 pm
One of the features of this discussion, as well as a discussion at Harvard Law School last week, was to ask what makes robots different as a matter of technology. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 12:19 pm
The following recap is by Jameson Jones of the Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:31 am
Larcker and Brian Tayan (Stanford University), on Monday, May 13, 2024 Editor's Note: David F. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:31 am
Larcker and Brian Tayan (Stanford University), on Monday, May 13, 2024 Editor's Note: David F. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 4:18 pm by Legal Aggregate
Here, Stanford Law Professor David Freeman Engstrom and Catherina Xu, a member of the Stanford Law School class of 2024, discuss the Court’s ruling in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 3:02 pm by Mary Minow
Perhaps the most problematic part of the handbook is Chapter 1 on Subject Matter. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 11:56 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Well, Stanford Law School’s Professor Mark Lemley immediately took to Twitter to label the decision in Berkheimer a “blockbuster”. [read post]