Search for: "Mazie"
Results 381 - 400
of 778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie suggests that this week’s orders allowing the latest version of the administration’s entry ban to go into full effect pending appeals “hinted that if Mr Trump’s travel ban reaches [the Supreme Court], a majority may be unreceptive to arguments it should be struck down as executive overreach or a violation of the constitution. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:57 am
” Additional coverage comes from Ariane de Vogue and Geneva Sands for CNN and from Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Espresso blog. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:34 am
” Briefly: In his column for The Economist, Steven Mazie weighs in on a recent dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc in a Tenth Circuit challenge to the Affordable Care Act’s birth control mandate, which Lyle Denniston also covered for this blog; Mazie observes that although, until recently, “it had seemed that the latest and most persnickety challenge to Obamacare was going nowhere fast,” “five federal judges predicted that the… [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:39 am
” A mini version of Mazie’s preview is here. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:22 am
” “For a body that should be concerned with cutting away the shrubbery obscuring stop signs,” Mazie concludes, “that’s a tall order. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
For The Economist, Steven Mazie reports that during oral argument in this week’s two partisan-gerrymandering cases, Rucho v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am
” Writing for The Economist, Steven Mazie weighs in on Horne v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 3:54 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at Moore v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 4:56 am
” And at The Economist, Steven Mazie discusses the administration’s petition for review. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 8:18 am
Mazie, according to the judge’s written opinion. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 4:26 am
” At The Economist’s Espresso blog, Steven Mazie notes that “this year’s 43 pending cases are less ideologically fraught than last term’s. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:25 am
” Additional coverage of the argument in Packingham comes from Chris Geidner at Buzz Feed, who notes that some justices appeared concerned “that accessing a web site like nytimes.com could trigger the criminal law because it allows people to create profiles in order to comment on and respond to articles,” Adam Liptak in The New York Times, Brent Kendall in The Wall Street Journal and Steven Mazie in The Economist. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 7:15 am
(In an earlier post, Mazie also looked ahead at the upcoming Term.) [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:25 am
Coverage of Tuesday’s oral arguments in the challenges to state bans on same-sex marriage comes from David Savage in the Los Angeles Times and Steven Mazie in The Economist (subscription required), while commentary comes from Robert George at Public Discourse, Gene Schaerr at the Daily Signal, Andrew Koppelman and Ilya Somin in an op-ed for USA Today, with a response in a letter to the editor from David Boyle, Steven Mazie at Big Think, Michael Dorf at Dorf on Law,… [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:38 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie discusses the court’s decision this week in Moore v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 3:54 am
” And at Big Think, Steven Mazie contends that “one query during the January 11 oral hearing suggests that the Supreme Court may be ready to upend nearly four decades of mandatory ‘fair-share fees’ based on a profound misconception about the collective action problem known as free ridership. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 4:09 am
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie discusses the court’s dismissal as moot last week of one of two challenges to President Donald Trump’s March 6 travel ban, noting that “[a]s one set of battles over Mr Trump’s appetite for banning Muslim people from America’s shores fizzles out, another is set to begin. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 8:00 am
Mazie. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 3:53 am
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie suggests that “ratifying Alabama’s decision to put a very sick man with large gaps in his memory to death effectively, if not formally, puts the Supreme Court on one side—arguably the wrong one—of a philosophical debate over personal identity and punishment. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 7:31 am
” Steven Mazie makes a similar observation at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog; he argues that, if “come next spring, affirmative-action admissions policies are found to contravene the 14th Amendment’s equal-protection guarantee, or mandatory union dues are struck down as a violation of free speech, it will be the liberals’ turn to decry the court’s judicial activism while conservatives nod solemnly and announce that the Constitution has… [read post]
