Search for: "Mcdonnell, Appeal of"
Results 381 - 400
of 610
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2015, 5:15 am
The trial judge and an appeals panel both sided with UPS. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:19 am
This three-step legal test is known as the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 8:24 am
The district court granted summary judgment in favor of UPS and the United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit affirmed. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:12 am
Instead, the Court held that an employee who asserts a disparate treatment claim under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, should have her claim analyzed under the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting analysis.In a nutshell, the analysis works like this: 1. [read post]
Do pregnant workers get ‘most-favored-employee’ status in High Court’s pregnancy accommodation case?
26 Mar 2015, 11:05 am
McDonnell Douglas applied. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 9:30 am
” The District Court for the District of Maryland granted UPS’s motion for summary judgment and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed, finding that UPS’s light-duty-for-injury policy was “pregnancy neutral” as required by the PDA. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 10:04 pm
However, it sent the case back to the federal appellate court (the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals) to determine whether UPS’ reasons for having treated Young less favorably than other non-pregnant employees were pretextual. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:20 am
Bob McDonnell’s appeal of his conviction on federal corruption charges. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:49 am
Lobbying “Inside the Powerful Lobby Fighting for Your Right to Eat Pizza” by Andrew Martin for Bloomberg News “Why Congress Relies on Lobbyists Instead of Thinking for Itself” by Lee Drutman and Steven Teles for The Atlantic Campaign Finance California: “State Panel Considers Raising Thresholds for Campaign Reporting” by Patrick McGreevy for Los Angeles Times Kentucky: “In An Election Year, Kentucky Senate Votes to Double Campaign Contribution Limits”… [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 9:37 am
Bob McDonnell appealed his conviction to the 4th U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 6:49 am
Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against them, in part, because the names have been publicly available for five years. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:12 am
For the trial court, the issue boiled down to the third prong of the McDonnell Douglas test. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 6:33 pm
Because there was direct evidence of discrimination, the McDonnell Douglas burden shifting framework was unnecessary. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 2:40 pm
Bob McDonnell will remain free while he appeals his corruption convictions, a federal court ruled Monday. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:25 am
Joshua Rich & Andrew Williams, partners at McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 8:45 pm
January 20, 2014 - "Top Patent Law Stories of 2014" (McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP) - 10:00 am to 11:15 am (CT) January 22, 2015 - "Preparing for and Navigating PTAB Appeals Before the Federal Circuit -- Conducting PTAB Trials With Eye to Appeal, Determining Errors for Appeal, Understanding PTO Practice and Federal Circuit Law" (Strafford) - 1:00 to 2:30 pm (EST) January 29, 2015 - "IPR Defense: An Overview of Strategic… [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 9:32 pm
Bob McDonnell will receive from the judge today. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 8:45 pm
January 8, 2015 - "Proving and Avoiding Inequitable Conduct in Patent Prosecution and Litigation -- Leveraging Court Treatment Post-Therasense and the AIA's Answer to Inequitable Conduct Issues" (Strafford) - 1:00 to 2:30 pm (EST) January 13-14, 2015 - Advanced Summit on Life Sciences Patents (American Conference Institute) - New York, NY January 20, 2014 - "Top Patent Law Stories of 2014" (McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP) - 10:00 am to 11:15 am (CT)… [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 1:35 pm
From Hollywood appeal to legal implications, each expert cited different reasons for the significance of the McDonnell story. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 6:24 pm
Indeed, without an interlocutory appeal, and following a trial, the Fifth Circuit could find the ruling incorrect, thereby forcing the parties to go back to square one and retry each individual case under the McDonnell Douglass paradigm. [read post]
