Search for: "Miles v. United States"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,716
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2016, 10:00 am
The United States has two separate sets of laws that govern the citizens of each state. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:11 am
In H&R Block Eastern Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:16 am
State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 9:42 am
United States, No. 12-597C (2013) involved Miles Construction’s request for reimbursement of its attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 10:58 am
Kennedy, Jr., United States District Judge. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am
Justice Clark read his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:53 am
On April 23, the Supreme Court of the United States issued an opinion in County of Maui, Hawaii v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 5:51 am
§ 112, second paragraph.Of obviousness“In United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 8:05 am
Patrick’s Day Parade and the United States Supreme Court, Gretchen Van Ness, 30 New Eng.L.Rev. 625 (1996). [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:23 am
Every coastal state, regardless of the actual presence of a geological continental shelf, is entitled to a legal continental shelf of up to 200 nautical miles, the maximum breadth of the EEZ as defined in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 7:11 am
Patton v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:08 pm
When he signs his plea deal, he initials a box that says: "“If I am not a citizen of the United States, my plea could result in my being deported from, or excluded from admission to the United States, or denied citizenship. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 6:16 am
The doctrine was first recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Cady v. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 10:01 pm
United States, supra. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:12 pm
Ambien is the most widely prescribed sleep aid in the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:04 am
” In her dissent, Justice Budd vehemently stated that the controlling opinion “allows for an encroachment upon an individual’s right to be free from an unreasonable search and seizure provided for in both art. 14 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights and the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 4:42 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 12:32 pm
See United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 9:21 am
In Philippines v. [read post]
