Search for: "Minus v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 871
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2022, 7:52 am
Mr Bailey states that the range of impact tolerances that have been submitted for payments-related IBS seems “surprisingly wide”. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:02 am
United States decision means. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 2:02 pm
Western States Ins. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:08 am
Dewine, 696 F.3d 490 (6th Cir. 2012), about off-label use: “[I]t is standard medical practice in the United States for physicians to prescribe FDA-approved drugs in dosages and for medical indications that were not specifically approved − or even contemplated − by the FDA, particularly where the alternative use is supported by adequate study. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:50 pm
In Fiduciary Financial Services of Southwest Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:43 am
A similar due process analysis governed the case in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:48 pm
Park v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 8:54 am
Also, the number of births, minus deaths, during that period is only about 2.8 million. [read post]
Texas Supreme Court Declines to Follow Hall Street in Arbitration Case: Nafta Traders, Inc. v. Quinn
13 May 2011, 3:33 pm
Mattel (Jun. 9, 2008) Professor Alan Scott Rau Gives Souter a C-minus (Jun. 5, 2008) Glen Wilkerson on Hall Street v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 9:45 am
[v] The waiver permits subgrantees to fulfill the LOC requirement (or any alternative permitted under the waiver) by utilizing any United States credit union that is insured by the National Credit Union Administration and that has a credit union safety rating issued by Weiss of B− or better. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
The same ‘white lab coat’ problem − that the jury will not be able to figure out the expert’s missteps − would seem to apply equally to basis, methodology and application. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:39 am
New York Appellate Division, Second Department: DeChico v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:39 am
New York Appellate Division, Second Department: DeChico v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 12:22 pm
The first of the decisions, Arroyo v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 6:41 am
In Berger v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
Today, the United States Supreme Court decided Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 1:14 pm
State Farm then paid that amount, minus depreciation and the deductible. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 10:14 am
June 10, 2019), and Fyk v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Jan. 7, 2015) (“a judicially-created implied requirement of ascertainability − that the members of the class be capable of specific enumeration − is inappropriate for (b)(2) classes”).But support for a “threshold ascertainability test” under Rule 23 is hardly limited to the Third Circuit. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:22 pm
In March of 2006, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
