Search for: "Moore v. Marks" Results 381 - 400 of 619
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2012, 4:40 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/yRWkxa (Henry Kelston) How to Create an eDiscovery Team – An Interview with HB Gordan from Teva Pharmaceuticals – bit.ly/xCM6yj (Amber Scorah) How to Reduce Medical Malpractice eDiscovery Issues and Costs - bit.ly/ylZmA5 (Matthew Keris) Innovation and Informed Risk-Taking are an eDiscovery Duty - bit.ly/zKtiDm (Chris Dale) Lester v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 12:39 am by Wessen Jazrawi
In the courts Hurley & Moore, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation & Skills [2012] EWHC 201 (Admin) (17 February 2012). [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:27 am by admin
The plea gets its name from 1970’s North Carolina v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am by INFORRM
She praised the current commission for working minimise harm and hurt suffered by complainants and providing quick and free access to redress, and advocated a kite mark system as a “marker of trust” for online publishers. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:06 am by Rosalind English
The post-mortem revealed that his wife had a broken nose, strangulation marks around her neck and four stab wounds. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 8:16 pm by Lara
Kryoman v Glo-bots: prepare for courtroom hoedown over neon lights and copyrights. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Mark Warby QC for the applicants described the ruling as “incomplete and an incompletely reasoned balancing exercise which ignores reputational concerns and gives the superficial appearance of fairness” The Administrative Court reserved judgment on the application. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 12:04 am
The surrender of Granadan King Boabdil to Spanish King Ferdinand V and Queen Isabella I marked an end to Moorish control that had begun in the 11th century. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Journalism and the PCC There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but four “resolved” complaints: Information Affairs Authority of Bahrain v The Independent, Clause 1, 14 December 2011 ; Mrs Kate Adams-Moor v The People, Clause 1, 13/12/2011; Brent Council v Kilburn Times Clause 1, 2, 12/12/2011; Mr Will Knock v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/12/2011. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court concluded in District of Columbia v Heller, 554 US 570 (2008), that “arms” refers to “weapons of offence, or armour of defence,” or “any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes into his hands, or useth in wrath to cast at or strike another,” id at 647 (quotation marks and citations omitted)—terms that cover more than just guns. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 10:31 pm by Lara
Trademark Ownership Showdown Trademark Attorney Ponders Parody — Yankees v Evil Enterprises Burning Man’s Burning Marks Nike 3, Jesuits 0 [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Journalism and the PCC Press Gazette reports that the Guardian has amended a headline about the Mark Duggan shooting but stands by its original story, following a complaint to the PCC by the Metropolitan Police. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm by INFORRM
Lady Moore, the wife of actor Sir Roger Moore, accepted “substantial” undisclosed libel damages and costs from Associated Newspapers over a claim by the Daily Mail that she lived with a “playboy” in the French Riviera during her youth. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 8:31 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)); Salinger v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am by Marie Louise
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica) District Court… [read post]