Search for: "Needles v. Needles"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2017, 5:00 am
In its recent decision in the case of Rohe v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
Preserve Your ObjectionsIn the slip and fall case of Showers v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 5:18 am
Last Friday, the 6th Circuit decided EEOC v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 6:36 am
He gets the state verdict back, but the federal claim is gone.The case is Triolo v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 10:09 pm
([C]ompare People v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Needle, 596 So.2d 1134 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Taylor v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 4:23 pm
The basis for the ruling in Miranda v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is Verghetta v Lawlor, 2016 NY Slip Op 30423(U) [Sup Ct Westchester County Mar. 9, 2016]. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is called Verghetta v Lawlor, and you can read here Justice Scheinkman’s 33-page post-trial decision dated March 9, 2016, the opening paragraph of which aptly sets the stage for the fair-value drama that follows, starring dueling appraisals over two thousand percent apart: This Court is called upon to determine the value of two corporate entities for purposes of permitting the buy-out of a minority shareholder. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 9:14 am
Case citation: The Ohio State University v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 9:44 am
case and, more recently, Kamla v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 7:48 pm
The Court continued to state that the teams not only competed against each other on the playing field and for the attraction of fans, but they competed in the market for intellectual property:"To a firm making hats, the Saints and the Colts are two potentially competing suppliers of valuable trademarks. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 1:46 pm
Ct. 2009) See also Parker v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Analyzing Major League Baseball's Antitrust Exemption after American Needle, 2 Harv. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 8:25 am
So, under this ruling, should the jury decide to thread the needle that way, a racial discrimination plaintiff can win her claim under Title VII but lose under Section 1981.pplicable to claimKhanna v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 6:08 am
Here's Justice Stevens from his concurring opinion in Baze v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 10:33 pm
" The other big decision this week was in the DACA case Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 10:00 am
Washington and US v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 5:18 am
Friedman v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 6:04 am
The way the Court reaches this conclusion may require some threading of a needle…” I [read post]
