Search for: "Nerds in Court"
Results 381 - 400
of 883
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2010, 8:42 pm
Yes, I realize this makes me a bluebook nerd.], “[p]olice May search a vehicle incident to a recent occupant’s arrest only if the arrestee is within reaching distance of the passenger compartment at the time of the search or it is reasonable to believe the vehicle contains evidence of the offensive arrest. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:34 pm
These nerds know all CGK, read obscure public documents and foresee only what is obvious (not what is inventive). [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 12:21 am
Supreme Court?] [read post]
24 May 2024, 12:47 pm
We don't usually include decisions from the Federal Circuit in our lineup, but this week we noticed that the court issued an en banc decision overruling its established test for assessing nonobviousness of design patents, and we thought we'd throw a bone to the IP nerds. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm
(I of course gained this experience while researching my dissertation on the habits of the nerd population, not as a member of it.) [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:37 am
Note: we don’t get many court opinions discussing E-SIGN or UETA, so I was nerdding out about this discussion. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 7:49 am
This is carried forward with our rules of civil procedure (Rule 17(b) for you nerds out there). [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 1:12 am
- - - - - * Bonus questions for all you jurisdiction nerds: Does it matter if the law at issue is relatively consistent across national borders (counterfeiting, say) or relatively diverse (privacy, election campaigning)? [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 1:19 am
Is the forum country’s foreign policy a factor when a court ruling undermines the sovereignty of lawmakers and courts in other countries? [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 6:12 pm
There's some important procedural lessons in this case for Federal Court procedural nerds. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 10:30 am
It’s a decision that is probably of interest only to criminal-defense nerds, admin-law nerds and Enclaves-Clause nerds, but I suspect that there are a higher-than-normal proportion of each reading this blog. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am
’” At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf posits that, contrary to the view of his fellow “law nerds,” who think “the public will view the case as fundamentally about trans equality, but in fact it’s mostly about administrative law,” “the uninformed public” may be “mostly right and the law nerds … mostly wrong”; if so, “then the administrative deference issue is secondary: the core question is whether anti-trans… [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 12:34 pm
Speaking of autumn, next week is the First Monday in October, and SCOTUS nerds across the land are rejoicing the start of another Supreme Court term. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:09 pm
It isn’t clear what this means for the distinction between the taxes, or what the real world implications are, but it is something for us state-tax nerds to think about. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:00 pm
My nerd friend Brian Faughnan did a great blog post on the subject, pointing out the numerous rules of professional conduct that would at least arguably be violated by this scheme. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 3:30 am
If any burglar is reading this, well, “NERD! [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 7:01 pm
(Oh, what a glorious time it was for eDiscovery nerds everywhere!) [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:07 am
Yes, we admit it: we're law nerds. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:57 am
Conclusion It’s a good time to be an Internet jurisdiction nerd. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 8:42 am
Taylor and McCoy have ignited a debate among qualified immunity nerds (that’s a compliment), as Adam Liptak has reported. [read post]
