Search for: "Nixon v. Nixon" Results 381 - 400 of 1,510
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am by Jonathan Shaub
With the House of Representatives set to pass the articles of impeachment to the Senate later today, Jan. 15, senators are still debating whether or not the president’s trial should involve hearing from witnesses. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
Among the most important outstanding issues as impeachment moves to the Senate is whether senators will attempt to obtain the testimony of senior executive branch officials who have, to date, declined to testify. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
The second article of the House’s impeachment resolution charges President Trump with obstruction of Congress. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 5:46 am by Philip Bobbitt
There is a unanimous Supreme Court case on point—United States v. [read post]
As former Justice Benjamin Curtis, who dissented in Dred Scott v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
This might explain some of what the Supreme Court said and did in the 1993 decision in Nixon v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 3:56 pm by Steve Lubet
Whatever the Walter Nixon v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Noel Semple
On October 25 & 26, Windsor Law proudly hosted the 2019 conference of the Canadian Association for Legal Ethics. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:00 am by Masha Simonova
He named Nixon as an unindicted co-conspirator in that case. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:44 am by Steve Vladeck
Instead, it points to the Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in United States v. [read post]