Search for: "Office of People's Counsel v. PUBLIC SERV." Results 381 - 400 of 1,320
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2020, 7:58 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Public people are entitled to private lives. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
  This statute was mentioned by the Court in 1988 as support for its opinion in the famous independent counsel case, Morrison v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 6:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
Counsel could not articulate a reason beyond the bare assertion that gyms are dangerous. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:31 am by David Kris
(For a discussion of how intelligence collection priorities are set through the NIPF and other processes, see pages 5-6 of this publication from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.) [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:22 am by Schachtman
In one such alternative universe, people would ask to examine the evidence for and against claims, and they would have a healthy respect for uncertainty. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Evan Caminker
Note: Dean Evan Caminker serves as co-counsel for the plaintiffs in this case.As we experience the coronavirus pandemic’s tragic consequences and hope for the day when “things return to normal,” it might be more difficult than usual to recognize that for some, “normal” conditions are egregious. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 8:33 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In tough times, people pull together. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 10:16 am by Michael Lowe
Marshals Service has an additional 75,000 people who are incarcerated pretrial, many in local jail or private contract facilities…. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 4:48 am by Sophia Tang
State immunity in global COVID-19 pandemic: Alters, et. al. v People’s Republic of China, et. al. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 9:48 pm by Sophia Tang
State immunity in global COVID-19 pandemic: Alters, et. al. v People’s Republic of China, et. al. [read post]