Search for: "Owings v. Respondent"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,300
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2021, 8:21 am
In a landmark decision in the case of Okpabi and others v Royal Dutch Shell Plc and Another, the United Kingdom Supreme Court (“UKSC”) ruled on a jurisdictional issue on whether the claimants/appellants have an arguable case that the defendants/respondents – Royal Dutch Shell (an English domiciled company) – owed them a common law duty of care so as properly to found jurisdiction against a foreign subsidiary company (Shell Petroleum Development… [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:30 am
The Supreme Court has since clarified the law in this area, including by reference to the CA’s decision in this case, in Vedanta Resources PLC and another (Appellants) v Lungowe and others (Respondents) [2019] UKSC 20. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 8:11 am
Court of Appeals, in Jacobson Holman PLLC v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
This appeal considered whether and in what circumstances the UK-domiciled parent company of a multi-national group of companies may owe a common law duty of care to individuals who allegedly suffer serious harm as a result of alleged systemic health, safety and environmental failings of one of its overseas subsidiaries as the operator of a joint venture operation. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 11:56 pm
Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 8:12 pm
In McGlenn v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 2:34 am
When the respondent declined, the appellant commenced arbitration proceedings. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:09 pm
For example, the agreements at issue did not disclaim the fiduciary duty of loyalty, and therefore, the general partner owed fiduciary duties to the limited partners, similar to those owed by directors of Delaware corporations. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 2:21 pm
These two 2019 rulings were followed by an April 2020 decision in Hughes v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 11:35 am
He notified Facebook but allegedly it never responded. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 4:06 am
It took the view that any duty is owed not to the charitable company i.e. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 7:21 am
In Collins v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:28 pm
Justice Sotomayor also responded to the Chief's concurrence. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am
Readers interested in learning about another Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act case currently before the Supreme Court, Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 8:28 pm
The Court in Council of Canadians with Disabilities v VIA Rail Canada Inc. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 8:28 am
Yesterday’s violent storming of the Capitol building raises questions about President Trump’s fitness to see out the remaining two weeks of his term; about whether large parts of the Republican Party remain committed to even basic norms of democratic government; and about how the country should move on from this brazen attack on the peaceful transition of power. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 6:34 am
" The full opinion can be found at the South Carolina Supreme Court website under Winrose Homeowners' Association, Inc., v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:08 pm
Subchapter V – Return to Work Reporting Requirement Employers have a method to report if an employee refuses to return to work Plain language about returning to work Subchapter VI – Other Related Provisions and Technical Corrections Pay an extra $100 per week to individuals who have at least $5,000 a year in self-employment income, but are disqualified from receiving Pandemic Unemployment Assistance because they are not eligible for regular state unemployment benefits. [read post]
