Search for: "PATTERSON v. STATE" Results 381 - 400 of 877
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2015, 8:28 am by Ralph L. Jacobson
The court would not, as the District sought, abrogate defendant’s duty of care under these facts, stating at 842:The wise and just rule to be applied in this case is one that imposes a duty of reasonable care upon the District to Patterson and apportions responsibility for damages between the District and Patterson according to their respective degrees of fault. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm by Bryan W. Wenter and Ronny Clausner
In essence, the CBIA’s challenge was based on the “unconstitutional conditions” doctrine from the Supreme Court of the United States’ Nollan v California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 11:20 am
 Does that mean that (1) the request should be denied, (2) that the judiciary can decide whether to deny the request, or (3) that only the State Department gets to decide whether to deny the request.The Ninth Circuit says it's (3).Which is exactly my view of the language as well. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Patterson, 218 P.3d 1031, 1037 (Ariz. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am by David DePaolo
”Last year the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board issued a significant panel decision, Patterson v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 5:15 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
=@Phillips , 515 F.3d at 235; see alsoWilkerson v. [read post]