Search for: "PETERS v. HOLDER"
Results 381 - 400
of 481
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2019, 3:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 12:31 pm
Paramount v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 8:27 pm
The Su Âpreme Court's decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 4:20 pm
As the SEP holder (i.c. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:50 pm
Check out Scott Greenfield's post on Berghuis v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 11:30 pm
She was an employee of Haringey but was also an office holder – appointed to the role of Director of Children’s Services by the Secretary of State. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:27 am
It’s hard not to feel sorry for the petitioner in Fernandes v Matrix Model Staffing, Inc., Decision and Order, Index No. 160294/2021 [Sup Ct, NY County Apr. 20, 2022]. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Indian Patent Office decisions now searchable and downloadable: (Indian Patent Oppositions), (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (Spicy IP), Institute for Progress study on inter partes re-examination: (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (IAM), (Hal Wegner) Nintendo loses patent suit over 3D controller; Anascape awarded $21M in damages:… [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
That claim was brought by Peter A. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 11:51 pm
Lee Pharma v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
: (IPEG),EU CORDIS launches a new web service for joint research initiatives: (IPR Helpdesk),EC announces plan to create single, EU-wide market for online music, films, and video games: (Ars Technica)GermanyGermans shun patents, but press for patent valuation ISO: (IPKat)Hong KongCreative commons Hong Kong begins public discussion (Creativecommons.com)IndiaBlawging our way to the front pages of Business Standard: (Spicy IP),Bootleg baloney: It's music to… [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 5:29 am
"United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 12:10 pm
The Delaware Court of Chancery's Sept. 30 decision in Brinckerhoff v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:21 am
S’holders Derivative Litig., 886 A.2d 1271, 1273 (Del. 2005) (citing Sugarland Industries Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:37 am
See McZeal v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 6:29 pm
v=XCbPFHu3OOc. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 1:07 am
It noted that declaring a patent as standard-essential to ETSI is a necessarily unilateral act of the SEP holder. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
The first case study is an analysis of various lawyers’ and law firms’ blogs about the 2014 Supreme Court case of Clark v. [read post]
