Search for: "Parks v. New York Times Company" Results 381 - 400 of 574
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2011, 1:42 pm
If New York law applied to this case, forseeability would be the "measure of liability". [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 7:28 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
**In passing, a New York Times blog describes the 102(b) activities of Dippin' Dots in the following way:Frosty Bites, however, argued that Dippin’ Dots had been selling its ice cream for more than a year before applying for a patent, a technicality that would invalidate its exclusive claim to the technology under a patent law provision. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 9:00 am by admin
As protestors continued to rage against corporate greed by occupying the streets of downtown New York, a few miles uptown an audience is buzzing in Fordham Law School’s McNally Theatre. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm by INFORRM
In the Courts The most important media law case of the week was Flood v Times Newspapers, heard in the Supreme Court on Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The only thing I’d add is that my award for “best attempt to make lemonade out of lemons” goes to the Creative Commons amicus brief, which uses the awful New York decision in Capitol Records v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 7:32 pm by Maxwell Kennerly
This article by New York Civil Liberties Union attorney Christopher Dunn in the New York Law Journal about Occupy Wall Street’s activities at Zuccotti Park is essential reading on the subject of permit-less protests on public land: In Clark v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:19 pm by Mandelman
  Official statements coming from HUD say that they don’t expect to meet the original goal of $1 billion, and the New York Times says it won’t be half that amount, but to-date the numbers, as close as I can remember, were coming in at like 250 applications and a handful of approvals. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:00 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: WXY v Gewanter, heard 11-15, 18-19 July 2011 (Slade J) Commissioner of Police v Times Newspapers, heard 18-20 & 22 July 2011 (Tugendhat J) Morrison v Buckinghamshire CC, heard 20 to 21 July (HHJ Parkes QC) Share this:PrintEmailTwitterFacebookLike this:Be the first to like this post. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
In response to certified questions, the New York Court of Appeals held that (a) proceeds of a fraud could constitute marital property, and (b) when part or all of the marital estate consisted of the proceeds of fraud, that fact did not, as a matter of law, preclude a determination that a spouse paid fair consideration according to the terms of New York's Debtor and Creditor Law section 272. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:18 pm by Oliver Gayner, Olswang
  Finally, in parallel US litigation, the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York has reached the opposite conclusion to the three English courts, finding (on summary judgment) that the “flip” provisions were in breach of the US Bankruptcy Code. [read post]