Search for: "Party X v. Party Y"
Results 381 - 400
of 463
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2017, 3:48 pm
And indeed falsely suggesting that X committed a serious crime that was really committed by Y can be defamation (especially once the speaker is on notice of the error). [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 4:12 pm
In determining whether a formal, or informal, claim for Condition X reasonably encompassed a claim for Condition Y, the Secretary has a duty to sympathetically read a pro-se veteran’s filings to determine whether a claim for benefits has been raised. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 4:29 pm
Section 2 of the Representation Agreement Regulationdefines routing management of the adult’s financial affairs as follows:2 (1) For the purposes of section 7 (1) (b) of the Act, the following activities constitute "routine management of the adult's financial affairs":(a) paying the adult's bills;(b) receiving the adult's pension, income and other money;(c) depositing the adult's pension, income and other money in the adult's accounts;(d) opening… [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 9:15 am
Beyond that, a song with samples v. a mashup with lots of samples are effectively the same thing from a legal standpoint. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 10:00 am
See Winter v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 6:53 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 8:06 am
' or 'How has X or Y affected your job? [read post]
8 May 2015, 3:54 am
Whether Boomer, X’er, Y’er, Millennial, young or old or middle-aged — I’d love to see it end. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:35 am
" Virginia's constitution sets up a General Assembly (Article IV), Governor (Article V), Judiciary (Article VI), and Constitutional Officers (Article VII Section 4). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Tx”. :: Y – Yawns. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 1:20 pm
Do you really need witness X to discuss topic A when you already have Y to discuss it? [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:56 pm
Magistrates in the Tang Dynasty in early China were also eager to avoid the formal legal system and so encouraged parties to resolve disputes amicably between themselves.[9] In contrast, the United States’ patent law can be seen in the case of Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 12:58 pm
To better address the complexity of subsurface conditions, construction agreements can include more detailed definitions of Site Condition and Unanticipated Site Condition: “Site Condition” means the natural or man-made physical, surface, subsurface, and other conditions at the site and the surrounding area as a whole, including (a) conditions relating to the environment, transportation, access, waste disposal, handling or storage of materials; (b) the availability or quality of… [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 10:25 am
s=top+10+2008&x=40&y=6. [read post]
24 May 2012, 11:21 am
See, e.g., Oxendine v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 11:17 pm
In the "Grounds of the Decision", the Opposition Division held that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the auxiliary request was new in view of documents [A1-A4] and did not result in an obvious manner from a combination of A2 with [A11 or A2].[...]V. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 10:49 am
The unprecedented leak of a draft majority opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
