Search for: "People v Holmes" Results 381 - 400 of 671
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2010, 7:48 pm by cdw
”  [via FindLaw] People v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court and other institutions of American government and civil society were largely timid in the face of McCarthyism.With the civil rights movement, progressives embraced free speech, but even then, it was not until 1965, in Lamont v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Until relatively recently, Article V and the hurdles it presented to formal constitutional amendment was seen as a feature rather than a bug, especially if one credited the constitutional theories of esteemed scholars like David Strauss or Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 12:37 pm by David Bernstein
For example, every “Progressive” legal commentator who ventured an opinion decried the Supreme Court’s invalidation of residential segregation in Buchanan v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:06 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: Study shows MMA fighters suffer brain injury in one third of bouts, April 12, 2016, Irish Times, By Muiris Houston More Blog Entries: Snaras v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 10:41 pm by Alex Harris
But, as with the First Amendment, Brandeis and Holmes dissented, presaging the arrival of the glorious Warren Court, which overturned Olmstead in Katz v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am by Giles Peaker
A has been seen by other people who know her ex-partner and has been moved out of Lambeth to another refuge in the adjoining borough of Southwark. [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 11:19 am by Sophia Tidler
Ferguson, which deemed the enslavement of black people constitutional during the agriculture era, and Korematsu v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
20 May 2010, 2:01 pm by Eugene Volokh
New York, 268 U.S. 652, 667 (1925); id. at 673 (Holmes, J., dissenting). [read post]