Search for: "People v Word"
Results 381 - 400
of 17,795
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2010, 2:39 am
This is a legal fiction because it is obvious that words are understood in different ways by different people. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 2:47 pm
People don't do anything without reasons. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
Professor Seck has recently been considering ramifications of Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum 569 U. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 12:18 pm
In other words, the thinking goes, defamatory words are those that cause actual harm to a person’s reputation in the community, even if there is no valid reason those words should cause such a reaction in people. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am
The proper construction of s 1(1) The background to this issue, and to the enactment of s 1(1), is the judgment in Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC (QB) 1414, in which Tugendhat J considered that there was a “threshold of seriousness” recognised under common law, and in which he favoured a definition that a statement was defamatory if it “… substantially affects in an adverse manner the attitude of other people towards [the… [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 2:17 am
The dust is starting to settle in the widely publicised case of Bragg v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 5:25 am
In People v. [read post]
22 May 2010, 5:38 am
Consider, for example, how heavily today’s decision rested on the analysis in the Supreme Court’s 1950 decision in Johnson v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
If McCulloch v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 5:20 pm
" Maybe it's a little bit confusing because of the whole "unlawful" part of "unlawful detainer," but still, it's a civil case, not a criminal one, so we don't find people "guilty" or not guilty. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 7:46 pm
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 7:46 pm
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 5:37 am
Under other circumstances, most knowledgeable people would say she was woefully unqualified. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 4:52 am
The government wants people to register their copyrights, however. [read post]
12 Dec 2012, 10:49 am
In fact, people often ask me whether it’s possible to use the old-fashioned Print dialog in Word 2010. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 5:30 am
Lewis v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 8:02 pm
Knight v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 8:51 am
For example, there is no free speech right to defame, to distribute obscene materials, or to use “fighting words. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:04 pm
Attorney's claim that she was going to use the video of the en banc oral argument "as a training tool" in her office to be artfully worded. [read post]
3 May 2021, 2:16 pm
You might think that in the pantheon of horrible things she's done, the fact that at least she was trying to contemporaneously kill herself as well might be one of her "better" (for lack of a superior word) decisions. [read post]
