Search for: "People v. Frank" Results 381 - 400 of 1,653
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2016, 4:41 am by Karen Ainslie
The Labour Court said the following: “It amounts to nepotism and corruption to become involved in the recruitment process of people to whom you feel favourable, in circumstances where you do not make full disclosure. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:16 am by Amy Howe
 And Michael Dorf has two posts on the decision:  at Verdict, he compares the Roberts Court’s view of politics with that of the fictional Frank Underwood in the TV series House of Cards, while at Dorf on Law, he disputes the argument that members of Congress “should be the last people to help decide who should govern. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 7:00 pm by David Smyth
On June 21st, Judge Paul Crotty largely denied a motion to dismiss in Richman v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 7:00 pm by David Smyth
On June 21st, Judge Paul Crotty largely denied a motion to dismiss in Richman v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:23 am by David Cosgrove
’” The Court stressed that the “core objective” of the Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Program was to “motivate people who know of securities law violations to tell the SEC. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 10:54 am
Courts have, at times, been hesitant to take judicial notice of the systemic and background factors affecting Aboriginal people in Canadian society (see, e.g., R. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Dodd-Frank Anti-Retaliation Provisions Do Not Protect Overseas Whistleblowers by Kevin LaCroix in the D&O Diary However, based on a recent Second Circuit decision, prospective foreign whistleblowers thinking about making a whistleblower report had better be prepared to watch out for themselves, as according to the appellate court’s August 14, 2014 decision in Liu Meng-Lin v. [read post]