Search for: "People v. Levell (1988)" Results 381 - 400 of 461
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2011, 8:01 am by Steve Hall
If U.S. authorities don't abide by the treaty that established it, those Americans — including members of the military, tourists, missionaries and business people — will be at risk, say support letters sent with the petition.That problem has attracted bipartisan attention at the highest levels of government. [read post]
30 May 2021, 8:57 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Canada (Attorney General), 1988 CanLII 67 (SCC), [1988] 1 S.C.R. 513, at p. 558, per L’Heureux-Dubé J. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
His disappointments grounded not in the annoyance of ideological systems producing good for the common people; it is rather the reverse, the sense of betrayal around an ideology the greatest success of which was its text. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
At the time, insulators were often thought of as having relatively low-level asbestos exposure. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
The Morris worm of November 1988 had already foreshadowed the Internet's coming loss of innocence, but it is interesting to note that the ordinary legal system found a way to deal with the MIT student who accidentally unleashed the first widely-deployed Internet pest. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 7:30 pm
At the federal level, ONC also is focusing on patient-centered health care. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Practice of Surrogacy At the most basic level, surrogacy is any arrangement in which a woman carries a baby for someone else. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm by Howard Knopf
Anyway, it’s probably a non-starter of a suggestion, since there are very few if any people in Canada who are sufficiently expert lawyers or economists to fulfill this role and who would not already have too much baggage to carry and still be perceived as credible to all concerned.So, I expect that my fear – shared by others – that this gratuitous statutory  references to the “public interest” and a “competitive market” will become an excuse… [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
The “voluntary” decision whether to cooperate is (or ought to be) located at the level of state or local government, not at the level of the individual state or local employees.Even though the Second Circuit&rs [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
  This statute was mentioned by the Court in 1988 as support for its opinion in the famous independent counsel case, Morrison v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am by Stephen Page
By virtue of Section 32DA of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 :-(i) “In an Act, a reference to a de facto partner is a reference to either one of two persons who are living together as a couple on a genuine domestic basis who are not married to each other or related by family;(v) For sub-section (1) – (a) the gender of the persons is not relevant…. [read post]