Search for: "People v. Novel"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,821
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2007, 11:27 pm
Indeed Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 8:41 am
Indeed Lone Wolf v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 4:16 pm
The Frye general acceptance test, however, continues to be the standard for determining reliability and admissibility of expert testimony in New York (see People v. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 7:29 pm
Antidote International Films, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2025, 5:07 am
The Thomas More Society further called the prosecutions “witch hunts” after the US Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
17 Nov 2012, 6:16 pm
In EEOC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 6:32 pm
The case, 303 Creative v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 1:13 pm
This occurred earlier today in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, where Mr Justice Arnold gave his ruling in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Another v Zynga, Inc [2012] EWHC 3345 (Ch). [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
Patents In Nokia v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 5:12 am
Baker v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:46 am
Co. of Oregon v. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 11:33 am
This right was recently affirmed by the Supreme Court in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:08 pm
Abood v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:43 pm
It's too easy to say we disbelieve an artist's purpose, as in Koons v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:44 am
The interesting thing was that even the State had argued against mooting the appeal… Novel Arguments: In State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 10:37 am
Furthermore, several E-discovery opinions such as Judge Grimm’s opinion in Victor Stanley [Victor Stanley, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 10:27 am
., et al. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 9:11 am
”Working with NITA’s fictitious “Homestead Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:52 pm
The Board of Appeal held that the claimed invention was novel and involved an inventive step.Trade MarksAlessandro Cerri reported on the highly anticipated judgment of the England & Wales Court of Appeal in Lidl v Tesco, which upheld the High Court's findings on bad faith, infringement, and passing off, including the findings in respect of the 'price-matching' allegation. [read post]
