Search for: "People v. Novo"
Results 381 - 400
of 503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2010, 5:39 pm
When Sentencing Court Found Notification not Required Under Pre-2008 Law Robert Gildersleeve et al. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 4:04 pm
(California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
Trust and Estate Implications Involving Potentially Incapacitated PersonsS.T. v. 1515 Broad Street, LLC (A-87-18) (081916) Argued November 6, 2019 -- Decided March 9, 2020ALBIN, J., writing for the Court.Only when, through proper legal procedures, a court determines that a litigant lacks the mental capacity to govern her affairs may the litigant be deprived of the right to decide the destiny of her lawsuit. [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:34 pm
It’s definitely not de novo. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:15 pm
Supreme Court, June 18, 2008 Munaf v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 4:12 am
In People v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 6:45 am
Russell v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm
By a 5-4 vote in Tandon v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 2:05 pm
” Scott v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:25 pm
See page 107 of FDA’s 1st Quarter FY2024 MDUVA V Report (here). [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 10:17 am
Colo.) on March 31 in Sgaggio v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:13 am
The court first held that its review of the TTAB’s factual findings was de novo under § 1071(b), following the logic of Kappos v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Even where there is a statutory right of appeal – which, under Vavilov, leads to de novo review – a court might legitimately adopt the decision-maker’s interpretation as its own. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 5:53 pm
People change their minds. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:31 am
The Second Circuit reviews the district court’s interpretation of a settlement agreement de novo. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm
v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Pino v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 5:05 am
This is what is called a de novo proceeding. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 10:37 am
Stauffer v. [read post]
