Search for: "Peters v. The State of Texas"
Results 381 - 400
of 629
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2014, 10:33 am
Kagan also was a nemesis for the lawyer for the protesting states, Texas Solicitor General Jonathan F. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IP finance), MARQUES international advertising portal goes live: (Class 46) Global - Patents Using patent landscaping analytics to improve the quality of M & A decisions: a review of Cox Enterprises’ $300M purchase of Adify: (IP Asset Maximiser Blog), Universities reap royalty rewards; investors ignore IP at their peril: (IAM), Top IP-owning nations claim faster patent processing; near harmonisation deal: (Intellectual Property Watch), Bosch, Xerox and Dupont sign up… [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 9:08 pm
It runs through the nineteenth century, where a number of states (including Tennessee and Texas, at page 20) seem to have copied North Carolina's language and prohibited monopolies and perpetuties. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:18 pm
See Hill v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
Penn State Law, Course Descriptions. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:04 pm
Texas, 2011 WL 6130403 (N.D. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 6:51 pm
Peters, 450 Fed.Appx. 470, 478-79 (6th Cir. 2011) (affirming summary judgment for defendants when plaintiffs expert witnesses failed to provide clear testimony that plaintiff specific condition would have been improved by timely administration of therapy); Bonesmo v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
’ Hirabayashi v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:55 am
: Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron, LLC (Florida Patent Lawyer Blog) (PatLit) District Court E D Texas: Device component may ‘receive’ data from itself: Datatreasury Corporation v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 6:00 pm
§ 101 rejections of software-based method claims in light of In re Bilski (FoundPersuasive) US Patents – Decisions District Court E D Texas: Computerised business method patent fails Bilski test under 35 USC 101: H&R Block Tax Services v Jackson Hewitt Tax Services Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Internet archive website is admissible evidence in touchscreen keyboard patent case: SP Techs, LLC v… [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:55 am
: Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron, LLC (Florida Patent Lawyer Blog) (PatLit) District Court E D Texas: Device component may ‘receive’ data from itself: Datatreasury Corporation v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 6:30 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 2:43 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC vacates FTC’s decision that Rambus breached antitrust duty by violating JEDEC patent disclosure rules and orders new trial: (Philip Brooks), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (IP Law360), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Hal Wegner), (IPBiz), (IP Law360), UK Court of Appeal rules on whether prior art not in the same design… [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:52 pm
United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:15 am
Gordon and Tracy V. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 2:26 pm
In Louisiana v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 6:04 pm
Texas attorney Phillip McCrury surveyed state laws for judicial approval of minors' settlements. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
-Texas) and Mike Turner (R. [read post]
