Search for: "Proper v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 22,865
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
This fourth installment focuses on questions from Justices Kagan and Sotomayor about the proper line between federal oversight and state regulations.] [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 2:26 pm
On a motion by President Shrum, the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma dismissed the suit for lack of standing, ruling that the United States Supreme Court in Summers v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
If Griffin's Case is the proper enunciation of the law, then a state cannot do any of the things Your Honor suggested unless Congress gives it authority to do so through implementing legislation. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:45 pm
University of South Florida Board of Trustees v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:03 am
They would potentially implicate Congress's powers under the "necessary and proper" clause as well. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:43 pm
” Amica v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 12:51 pm
That is the 1920 case called Eisner v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 8:44 am
Case Citation: Roland v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am
We note that in the Trump v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
On this reading one then understands that the opt-out in Article 83(3) relates only, as it explicitly states, to the “exclusive jurisdiction” of The Unified Patent Court. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
On the other hand, SL contended that the only reason she had not reported the accident to the proper people at the proper time was that she was embarrassed, as the Health, Safety and Training Manager, to have been involved in such an accident. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
On the other hand, SL contended that the only reason she had not reported the accident to the proper people at the proper time was that she was embarrassed, as the Health, Safety and Training Manager, to have been involved in such an accident. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
It states that, since VINs are assigned to a vehicle to ensure the latter’s proper identification, they are not – as such – personal data (para. 46). [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm
Since Mrs Justice Collins Rice handed down judgment in Fox v Blake [2024] EWHC 146 (KB) there has been a lot of online discussion about the case. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 11:30 am
The Supreme Court's unanimous landmark decision in Brown v. [read post]
