Search for: "Quick v. Department of Justice" Results 381 - 400 of 675
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2015, 4:35 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
., Director, Association of Village Council Presidents Tribal Justice Center   BETHEL, AK – The announcement of A.D., et al. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:39 am by Gregory Forman
Department of Public Health, 440 Mass. 309, 798 N. [read post]
2 May 2015, 4:11 am by SHG
Wardlow, where Chief Justice Rehnquist offered this bit of sophistry: Such a holding is entirely consistent with our decision in Florida v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 11:15 am by Sophia Cope
The Justice Department report on the Ferguson Police Department issued last month chronicled a pattern of abusive and unconstitutional behavior by police officers when citizens tried to record them (see pages 26-28). [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
  On June 26, 2013, when the Supreme Court decided the case of United States v. [read post]
At about 9.30 or 9.45 am I will pop in to see Lord Wilson or Lord Hodge, depending on who is sitting that day, to have a quick chat about the case. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 3:38 pm
  The Ninth Circuit swung mightily and missed with McClellan v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 11:45 am by Steve Vladeck
Given how the November 4 oral argument unfolded, the Supreme Court’s seven-to-two decision on Wednesday to side with a former air marshal-turned-whistleblower in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:18 pm by Benjamin Wittes
The Guardian has serialized the Slahi diary and has written triumphantly of its publication, while noting that: “one federal court has ordered [Slahi’s] release on the grounds that the evidence against him is thin and tainted by torture, [but] Slahi has been languishing in a form of legal limbo since December 2012 after the justice department entangled the case in an unresolved appeal. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 7:08 am by John Paul Schnapper-Casteras
Although opponents of disparate impact focus on Justice Scalia’s concurrence in Ricci v. [read post]