Search for: "Radio One, Inc"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,463
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2009, 10:45 pm
Eveready Battery Company, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
Loew’s Inc v CBS, 131 F.Supp. 165 (SD Cali 1955) held that a Jack Benny parody of the film Gaslight was not fair use. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:22 am
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently sanctioned brokerage firm WFG Investments, Inc. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
CBS Broadcasting, Inc., 491 F. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
CBS Broadcasting, Inc., 491 F. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 12:58 am
Similarly in Waits v Frito-Lay Inc., the US Court of Appeal determined that a radio commercial that imitated the voice of Tom Waits, a famous singer with a very unique voice, amounted to appropriation of publicity rights under California law and false, implied endorsement under federal law. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 5:40 pm
Town & Country Electric, Inc., 516 U.S. 85 (1995). [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:37 pm
In the Cogeco Cable Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 am
In Nightlight Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:09 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubrmani, with comments from Eric] In re Google Inc. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 5:39 pm
Zodiac Group, Inc., 2011 WL 3349573 (S.D. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 6:51 am
Tickets.com, Inc., 54 U.S.P.Q.2d 1344, 1346 (C.D.Cal., 2000).[7] See DeJohn v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 9:41 pm
T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 8:21 am
Last term, in RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:00 am
Dairy Found., Inc., 311 N.C. 679, 686 (1984) (“The fruit of the labor of one who is hired to invent, accomplish a prescribed result, or aid in the development of products belongs to the employer absent a written contract to assign. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 2:37 am
XM Satellite Radio, No. 1:06-cv-03733-DAB (S.D.N.Y. filed May 16, 2006). [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 8:54 am
See Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 2:34 pm
Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574 (1986). [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:24 am
Moreover, in Sutton v United Airlines, Inc, the Supreme Court stated that “an employer is free to decide that physical characteristics or medical conditions that do not rise to the level of an impairment — such as one’s height, build, or singing voice — are preferable to others, just as it is free to decide that some limiting, but not substantially limiting, impairments make individuals less than ideally suited for a job. [read post]
24 May 2016, 6:45 am
Web: www.ascap.com BMI – Broadcast Music, Inc. [read post]
