Search for: "Rather v. Rather" Results 381 - 400 of 76,605
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2008, 8:25 am
This is a rather unusual copyright infringement suit, in that even UMG agrees that there was no copying involved. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:33 am by Peter Groves
The consequence of this is perhaps rather less obvious: to stand out, the thing being considered has to be compared against something else. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
Part IV addresses the practical implications of applying equitable apportionment to groundwater, after which the discussion turns, in Part V, to Mississippi’s argument that this case must be decided based upon the equal footing doctrine, rather than equitable apportionment. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
Part IV addresses the practical implications of applying equitable apportionment to groundwater, after which the discussion turns, in Part V, to Mississippi’s argument that this case must be decided based upon the equal footing doctrine, rather than equitable apportionment. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
Part IV addresses the practical implications of applying equitable apportionment to groundwater, after which the discussion turns, in Part V, to Mississippi’s argument that this case must be decided based upon the equal footing doctrine, rather than equitable apportionment. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
Part IV addresses the practical implications of applying equitable apportionment to groundwater, after which the discussion turns, in Part V, to Mississippi’s argument that this case must be decided based upon the equal footing doctrine, rather than equitable apportionment. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
Part IV addresses the practical implications of applying equitable apportionment to groundwater, after which the discussion turns, in Part V, to Mississippi’s argument that this case must be decided based upon the equal footing doctrine, rather than equitable apportionment. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:36 am by Nate Persily
I have filed this amicus brief for political scientists in Evenwel v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
Part IV addresses the practical implications of applying equitable apportionment to groundwater, after which the discussion turns, in Part V, to Mississippi’s argument that this case must be decided based upon the equal footing doctrine, rather than equitable apportionment. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 10:40 am by Jason Mazzone
The bulk of commentary from legal academics on President Trump's Executive Order concerning admission of non-citizens into the United States has involved creative advocacy rather than useful analysis. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 3:58 pm
But even more than the legal analysis, the underlying facts -- in what would is facially just a simple DUI with injury case -- are bizarre and depressing.I am glad that I merely read about, rather than live, that world. [read post]
15 Aug 2006, 3:34 pm
  Let me commend the Southern District of Mississippi for finally putting stuff on their website that is available to the public, rather than requiring people to go through the federal courts' PACER... [read post]
5 May 2009, 11:19 am
I'm happy to have that guy peddle his wares in prison rather than on the streets. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 2:00 pm by Legal Skills Prof
From Education Week: As it turns out, what we don't know outweighs what we do know about how people comprehend texts on a digital screen rather than... [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
A public employee’s speech as a citizen rather than as an employee protected by the First AmendmentMatthews v City of New York, USCA, 2nd Circuit, Civ. 13-2915New York City Police Officer Craig Matthews sued the City of New York alleging that the City had retaliated against him for speaking to his commanding officers about an arrest quota policy at his precinct. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 2:31 pm
I think that the judiciary can and should expect the assertion of only fair and intellectually honest arguments from government lawyers on appeal, rather than simply the assertion of whatever "kitchen sink" contentions that might pass the test of frivolousness.I know that some might disagree, but I personally feel pretty strongly in this regard. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 4:13 pm
" Gaeta, slip op. at 8, citing Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 4:15 am by Julie Burke, Ph.D.
Here in Part V, we research successful after final petitions: ones properly processed by the USPTO and promptly granted. [read post]