Search for: "Reason v. Social Security Administration"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
In Department of Education v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:14 pm
In July 2021, the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 8:21 am
Maechtlen On November 19, 2012, in EEOC v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 8:55 am
” The question now before the court is whether that 25-percent cap applies only to attorney’s fees for representing a claimant in court or also to fees for representing a claimant before the Social Security Administration. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 10:52 am
In SEC v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
It stands to reason that people will do so as well. [read post]
26 May 2017, 7:37 am
Supreme Court, the Ninth Circuit concluded for a second time that a district court erred in refusing to enforce an EEOC administrative subpoena seeking “pedigree information” (name, social security number, and contact information) on employees and prospective employees who had taken an employer’s mandated physical strength test. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 6:49 pm
Loughran, as relator, brought a lawsuit under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act, alleging that Unum Group (“Unum”) had burdened the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) by knowingly causing people to file baseless applications for Social Security disability insurance. [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:28 am
The Social Security Administration interprets the Social Security Act to allow children conceived after their father’s death to qualify for Social Security survivors benefits only if they could inherit from their father under state intestacy law. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 4:28 pm
France, Stoll v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 11:43 pm
After he had handed over his license, paperwork, address and phone number, Case was questioned as to whether he knew anything about Ronald Case and was asked to provide his social security number. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:16 pm
In sum, there is good reason to worry about government use of coercion to either suppress speech (as the Biden Administration may well have done in Murthy v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
" Relying upon Wyman v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:02 pm
There is, however, another problem at the Social Security Administration: supposed variability among ALJs. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
”Further, the court noted that there was substantial evidence in the record to establish that Russo, in her role as a court security supervisor, subjected one or more persons “to heightened security measures on a regular basis either for personal reasons or for no legitimate reason” and that she caused her male subordinate to do the same. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 12:59 pm
In response to Landon’s argument that he was joking, the court says that it does not matter—it was reasonable for the school officials to take the threat seriously. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 6:30 am
Kennard stopped working in 2006 and filed a claim to receive Social Security benefits. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:37 pm
Among other things, the decision could blow up the process that the Social Security Administration uses to determine who is entitled to benefits — although someone would have to file a new lawsuit before that could happen. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 12:30 pm
[A Social Security screw-up, prolonged detentions, and greasing the wheels of justice.] [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 5:54 am
In Raybourne v. [read post]
