Search for: "Roebuck"
Results 381 - 400
of 637
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2011, 1:39 am
Sears, Roebuck & Company, 792 N.E.2d 145 (Mass. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 3:36 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., In Re Walgreen Co. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 12:24 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542, 1546 (Fed. [read post]
From Cedar Grove, NJ: US patent application 20150148720 titled Discreet Sexual Stimulation Apparatus
29 May 2015, 9:04 am
The home versions soon became extremely popular, with advertisements in periodicals such as Needlecraft, Woman's Home Companion, Modern Priscilla, and the Sears, Roebuck catalog; however, these disappeared in the 1920s, apparently because their appearance in pornography made it no longer tenable for mainstream society to avoid the sexual connotations of the devices. [0006] In the 1960's the modern "personal" vibrator re-emerged as a by-product of the sexual revolution. [read post]
18 May 2013, 3:00 am
Further information about the EEOC is available on its website at www.eeoc.gov Read more about the "EEOC" and workers' compensation Sears Roebuck Pays $6.2 Million for Inflexible Workers Oct 02, 2009 EEOC Chicago District Director John Rowe, who supervised the agency's administrative investigation preceding the lawsuit, said that the case arose from a charge of discrimination filed with the EEOC by a former Sears ... [read post]
17 May 2013, 7:36 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., Case No. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 11:56 pm
” (internal quotation marks and citationsomitted)); Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:38 pm
Because his job as manager of a Sears Roebuck store was so stressful, and because his physicians concluded stress would very likely exacerbate his coronary condition, Mr, Blankenship submitted a disability claim to Sears’ ERISA disability “insurer,” MetLife. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 6:30 am
This event will speak to the research interests of Derek Roebuck and Johnny Veeder, in whose memory the history of arbitration project is funded.An important aspect of this symposium is that we hope it will interest and benefit graduate students and early career researchers. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 2:46 am
Sears Roebuck & Co. (7th Cir. 2012). [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:47 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co.) [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:28 am
Sears Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542, 1548 (Fed. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 4:31 am
In Sears, Roebuck, although the case came to us on a motion to dismiss, not a motion for summary judgment, we held that “inasmuch as the relationship between Sears, Roebuck as property owner and Enco Associates as architects had its genesis in the contract between them . . . the owner may recover contract damages against the architects either on the theory of breach of a particular contract provision or on the theory of failure to exercise due care in the performance of… [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 4:37 pm
" Sears Holdings (Roebucks), Case 18-CA-19081 (December 4, 2009) In 2010, the NLRB appeared to do an about face. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:59 pm
Interpretation Difficulties: Jeremy Roebuck of The Philadelphia Inquirer has this piece on the difficulties in prosecuting defendants with severe communication impediments, such as accused drug mule Juan Jose Gonzalez Luna, who is deaf, mute, illiterate, and has no knowledge of sign language. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 2:26 am
Magill, 698 So. 2d 1244, 1254 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (stating that "Florida law generally frowns on class action in contract matters") Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 10:11 pm
Sears, Roebuck, & Co.) [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 6:45 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., Nos. 11-8029, 12-8030, slip op. at 2 (7th Cir. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 9:17 am
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Local YouTube Star Pleads Guilty in Large-Scale Cable Piracy Case First off today, Jeremy Roebuck at The Philadelphia Inquirer reports that YouTuber Bill Omar Carrasquillo has pleaded guilty to various crimes including copyright infringement, tax evasion and fraud. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 2:57 am
"In 1996, the state Legislature, through an amendment to CPLR Section 214(6), overruled Sears, Roebuck's holding that differing statutes of limitations governed the damages available in architectural malpractice suits grounded in tort instead of contract.7 This legislative action swept away the notion that tort damages were available only during a three-year limitations period but that contractual damages were available for six years. [read post]
