Search for: "STATE v COOL"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,414
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2017, 4:47 pm
The Declarations presents the current position of the Cuban state in the Affair of the Sonic Weapons Attacks and suggests that both sides may be digging in their heels and are preparing for a long period of cooling relations. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:28 am
Rosenblatt & Co. v Davidge Data Sys. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 9:34 pm
(Isn’t Professional Responsibility just unbearably cool? [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 11:56 am
In Rembrandt Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 11:56 am
In Rembrandt Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 11:30 pm
So the patents are, for now, not completely immune to the attack as stated by Allergan's press release (although a different deal and parties could take a different position which could make the sovereign immunity v federal court position a bit murkier). [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 8:43 am
See generally County Court of Ulster v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:54 pm
” Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 4:16 pm
Prince Harry v Mail Online On 4 March 2017, the Mail Online published an article headlined, “Time to cool off! [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
Finally, the paper alludes to a tendency to remove family matters from courts by shifting them to extra-judicial institutions or even to the parties and their party autonomy (section V.). [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 12:00 am
“Big George” Webley seemed like a cool guy and had a wild wit and great sense of humor. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 3:54 am
But isn’t the EEOC there to speak for the United States? [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm
The contrast with the cool and measured approach (unlike, it is accepted, this post) of Lords Kerr and Wilson in their minority judgment is notable. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 4:52 pm
Referring to the US – Tuna II and US – COOL disputes, the Mexican Minister of Economy recently stated that the WTO disputes settlement mechanism has been more efficient for Mexico than Chapter 19.[1] What a terrible statement from our chief negotiator! [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 12:38 pm
All the lawyers in the Brett Kimberlin v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
So let’s be cool, not hot. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 6:40 am
Indeed, because consumers may be particularly vulnerable to deceptive acts from traveling salespersons who enter their home, consumers may rescind any transaction with a door-to-door salesperson during a three-day cooling-off period. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 7:31 am
Relevant to Hitachi v. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 1:30 am
The Court’s 2000 holding in Bush v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 12:30 am
I started off, as every cool kat does, by searching self-indulgent terms. [read post]
