Search for: "Sears, Roebuck," Results 381 - 400 of 424
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2018, 3:05 pm by Mark Walsh
Anyone who thought that just because one member of the Supreme Court had invited a test case about whether to overrule Quill Corp. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm by John Elwood
Cobb, 13-138; Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Sears Roebuck & Co., 203 F. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
Here is IP Think Tank's weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
At its Conference on February 21, 2014, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as rights of eighteen- to twenty-year-olds under the Second Amendment, police use of nontrivial force against a passively resisting arrestee, Federal Power Act requirements for interstate electric rates, preemption of local ordinances banning renting housing to illegal aliens, and whether hosting poker games is a federal felony. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Sears Roebuck & Co., 203 F. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
In June 2008 the Texas Supreme Court denied review in the following cases. [read post]
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.; from Dallas County; 5th district (05-07-00758-CV, 270 SW3d 632, 08-21-08, pet. denied Sep. 2009) (breach of indenture agreement)09-0050JOHNNY RODRIGUEZ, JR. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:05 am by Eugene Volokh
Another excerpt from the First Amendment section of my Social Media as Common Carriers? [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:07 pm by Schachtman
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 386 F.3d 21, 35 (1st Cir. 2004)(holding that trial court erred in allowing crossexamination and final argument on expert witness’s supposed failure to produce all working notes and videotaped recordings while conducting tests, when objecting party never made such document requests). [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Sears Roebuck & Co., 203 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Sears Roebuck & Co., 203 F. [read post]