Search for: "Security Pacific National Bank" Results 381 - 400 of 426
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
After Stevens What will the Supreme Court be like without its liberal leader? … [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 5:51 am by Kelly
To recover the rest, I’ve proposed a fee on the biggest banks. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:25 pm by Jeralyn
To recover the rest, I have proposed a fee on the biggest banks. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
" in other words, because there are so many participants in national stock markets, and those participants have such a voracious appetite for information, then anything about a particular stock is essentially instantaneously reflected in that stock’s price. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:03 am by Simon Lester
Given the worldwide effort to reregulate banking, securities, derivatives and other financial services, including the recent legislation passed in the House of Representatives, no trade agreement with the United States should contain any constraints on the ability of Congress to regulate either foreign financial service firms operating here or the cross-border provisions of financial services. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 9:42 am by The Complex Litigator
Security Pacific National Bank, supra, 23 Cal.3d at p. 450-451; Prata v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:09 am by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
China's leaders and commentators think President Barack Obama's visit in November was an unqualified success. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:43 am by Lyle Denniston
National Australia Bank (08-1191) - application of U.S. securities fraud law to trans-national securities dealings Renico v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm by Tom Goldstein
National Australia Bank Docket: 08-1191 Argument date: Will be set for argument in March or April 2010 Question presented: When may federal courts hear a suit by foreign plaintiffs alleging that they were harmed by securities fraud in a transaction conducted overseas but that nonetheless has ties to the United States? [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:51 am by Matt C. Bailey
Security Pacific National Bank, supra, 23 Cal.3d at p. 450-451; Prata v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:48 am
The more time I spend reviewing decisions in the complex litigation/class action arena, the more I am convinced that the lower Courts of California are, in many instances, at odds with the California Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
Security Pacific National Bank, supra, 23 Cal.3d 442, 452, 153 Cal.Rptr. 28, 591 P.2d 51) has led courts repeatedly and consistently to hold that relief under the UCL is available without individualized proof of deception, reliance and injury. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 5:26 am by Christoph Koettl
The World Bank is predicting that a historic high of 1.02 billion people will be left hungry this year. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 1:05 am
The National Law Journal Although the Obama administration appears to have backed off from more extreme plans to merge the Securities and Exchange Commission in a major consolidation of agencies, the SEC may still surrender authority to the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and a new consumer protection agency. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 1:05 am
The National Law Journal Although the Obama administration appears to have backed off from more extreme plans to merge the Securities and Exchange Commission in a major consolidation of agencies, the SEC may still surrender authority to the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and a new consumer protection agency. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:07 am
Hanover Bank & Trust Co, and does the fact that the debtor failed to initiate an adversary proceeding render the enforceability of the discharge order under 11 U.S.C. 1327(a)inapplicable? [read post]
22 May 2009, 6:00 am
Security Pacific National Bank, supra, 23 Cal.3d 442, under which restitution may be ordered ‘without individualized proof of deception, reliance, and injury if necessary to prevent the use or employment of an unfair practice.'" (In re Tobacco II Cases, at p. ___, fn. 14.) [read post]