Search for: "Shoe Show, Inc."
Results 381 - 400
of 518
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2011, 4:55 am
Aeropostale Inc. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 8:12 pm
Assuming that Louboutin’s trademark is valid, Louboutin would have to show that Yves Saint Laurent’s red sole shoe is or is likely to cause consumer confusion and deception among consumers. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 2:41 pm
Am., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 10:13 am
The Shape-up show has become a large source of revenue for the Skechers brand, as the U.S. toning shoe market craze is sweeping the retail market. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:41 am
“Woman Sues Adidas After Fall She Blames on Sticky Shoes” [Lowering the Bar] Texas lawmakers file loser pays proposals [SE Tex Record] Actual scope of proposals hard to discern through funhouse lens of NYT reporting [PoL] Marie Gryphon testimony on loser-pays proposals in Arkansas [Manhattan Institute, related] Google awarded patent on changing of logo for special days [Engadget via Coyote] “Civil Gideon in Deadbeat Dad Cases Would Be ‘Massive’ Change,… [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:50 pm
Blum: but it doesn’t understand that boots function like shoes. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:15 am
Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:39 pm
Davis, (U.S. 1976); WMX Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 6:56 pm
Airgas, Inc., et al., C.A. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 1:38 am
In re Jonathan Drew, Inc. d/b/a Drew Estate (January 28, 2011) [precedential]. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 4:22 pm
Names of places and words like tortilla, computer, coffee, shoes, etc. are good targets for a disclaimer. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm
Zahn, 823 S.W.2d 18, 22 (Mo.App. 1991).Parties are permitted to introduce extrinsic evidence to impeach a witness by showing his or her inability to perceive the events testified to; prior convictions; or to show bias, prejudice or interest in the proceeding, regardless of whether the subject of the extrinsic evidence is independently material to the case. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:06 am
The subsidiaries bolster their arguments by pointing to the Court’s seminal jurisdiction case International Shoe v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 11:53 am
PSKS, Inc., 551 U.S. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 2:30 pm
Nokia, Inc., 349 Ill. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 12:40 pm
, Inc., 09 Civ. 4373 (SAS) (JLC), slip op. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 1:35 pm
Whether you own a website where you allow blogs and comments to be posted, or if you are the blogger/poster, listen up. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 5:41 pm
Danielson, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:20 pm
©2010 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. [read post]
