Search for: "Smith v. United States of America" Results 381 - 400 of 748
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
United States 14-1145Issue: Whether, under Holland v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:44 am
Langbein, The Disappearance of Civil Trial in the United States, 122 Yale Law Journal 522, 547-48 (2012).] [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:57 am by WIMS
 "waters of the United States. [read post]
15 May 2015, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
Over at The Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Volokh reported on the Second Circuit’s recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm by JB
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:56 am
United States (1983), the Supreme Court rejected a university’s claim for a religious exemption from a federal rule that barred race discrimination by tax-exempt organizations. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
Half a million people outside North America play Scrabble on Facebook. 2.4 million people have downloaded the SCRABBLE app for iOS. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:02 am
We have seen companies, from small to large, expanding outside their borders to the rest of Latin America, Africa, and the United States. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 11:56 am
We have seen companies, from small to large, expanding outside their borders to the rest of Latin America, Africa, and the United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am by Robert Chesney
Part I begins by placing the Administration’s proposal in context with the authority the Administration already claims under color of Article II of the Constitution of the United States as well as the 2001 AUMF directed at al Qaeda. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm by rainey Reitman
  Similarly, the United States Congress is elected by American voters. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Not so—as the Smith decision accurately stated, the “vast majority” of prior cases had applied the Smith approach. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Not so—as the Smith decision accurately stated, the “vast majority” of prior cases had applied the Smith approach. [read post]