Search for: "Standard v. U. S" Results 381 - 400 of 3,024
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm by Jonathan M. Barnett
”  In contrast, the agency’s previously released strategic plan had described the agency’s mission as promoting “competition” for the benefit of consumers, consistent with the case law’s commitment to protecting consumer welfare, dating at least to the Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in Reiter v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
By adopting the 2014 constitutional amendments, the People significantly altered both substantive standards governing the determination of district lines and the redistricting process established to achieve those standards. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
By adopting the 2014 constitutional amendments, the People significantly altered both substantive standards governing the determination of district lines and the redistricting process established to achieve those standards. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 7:29 am by Corbin K. Barthold
If this question interests you, Robinson’s decision in National Petroleum Refiners v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 6:06 am by David J. Simon
It thereby lifts liability without necessarily compelling cooperation, as Michael Becker flagged following the magistrate judge’s initial ruling in The Gambia v. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 2:49 pm by Dennis Crouch
See Note, Subtests of “Nonobviousness”: A Nontechnical Approach to Patent Validity, 112 U. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 4:35 pm
To the contrary, the Rule directly furthers the City’s conception of what is necessary for its general welfare. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 2:50 pm by Binnall Law Group
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Signals Acceptance of Purdue Standard, in Line with Binnall Law Group’s Amicus Curiae Brief Filed on Behalf of SAVE appeared first on Binnall Law Group. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 12:01 am by Florian Mueller
And three other Thales amici--Honda, Continental, and u-blox--first failed to file mandatory paper copies of their brief and then even their paper vesion was out of compliance with the appeals court's rules. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
In denying plaintiff's motion, the court determined that a reasonable jury could have concluded that Miller's "mistake and the shooting that resulted" did not violate any applicable standard of care and hinged on a credibility determination best left for the jury (US Dist Ct, ND NY, 3:13 CV 107, Sept. 27, 2017, McAvoy, Sr. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
In denying plaintiff's motion, the court determined that a reasonable jury could have concluded that Miller's "mistake and the shooting that resulted" did not violate any applicable standard of care and hinged on a credibility determination best left for the jury (US Dist Ct, ND NY, 3:13 CV 107, Sept. 27, 2017, McAvoy, Sr. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 11:33 am by Alden Abbott
Supreme Court famously proclaimed American antitrust law to be a “consumer welfare prescription” in Reiter v. [read post]