Search for: "State v. Barrett" Results 381 - 400 of 1,965
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2020, 11:00 am by Evan Lee
The Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously reinstated the rape convictions of three former servicemen in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by SHG
Ultimately, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Wooden v. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
” Section V turns to the interaction between the Ineligibility Clause and the Religious Test Clause. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 11:14 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] On Friday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Trump v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm by Schachtman
The trial court, alas, erred in stating the relevant statistical concepts. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 9:26 am by Eric Goldman
Next, he canvasses the two California Supreme Court rulings on Section 230, Barrett v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
However, where, as here, the agency "fails to inform the person [or entity] making the FOIL request that further administrative review of the determination is available, the requirement of exhaustion [of administrative remedies] is excused (Matter of Lepper v Village of Babylon, 190 AD3d 738, Matter of Barrett v Morgenthau, 74 NY2d 907; [see Matter of Rivette v District Attorney of Rensselaer County, 272 AD2d 648]; 7. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
However, where, as here, the agency "fails to inform the person [or entity] making the FOIL request that further administrative review of the determination is available, the requirement of exhaustion [of administrative remedies] is excused (Matter of Lepper v Village of Babylon, 190 AD3d 738, Matter of Barrett v Morgenthau, 74 NY2d 907; [see Matter of Rivette v District Attorney of Rensselaer County, 272 AD2d 648]; 7. [read post]