Search for: "State v. Board of Medical Examiners"
Results 381 - 400
of 913
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2017, 5:16 am
[iii] See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm
A Civil Investigative Demand Issued to You or Your Medical Practice is Serious Business. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:14 am
Today the court hears oral argument in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 8:03 am
George’s medical entrance examination indicated no mental health disorders. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 11:36 am
However, in 2019, the state responded to declining vaccination rates by amending its law to allow for only the medical exemption. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Butts v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 5:47 am
In fact, it is not unprecedented for a judge to order appointment of an independent vocational expert pursuant to Labor Code section 5701, much like a “regular physician” is appointed by a judge when the medical-legal record is insufficient to rely on for a just decision and the parties will not agree to an agreed medical examiner [ see City of Torrance v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:12 am
The editorial boards of the Christian Science Monitor, the Los Angeles Times, and the Chicago Sun-Times characterize the case as a victory for religious freedom, as do op-eds in the Houston Chronicle and the Washington Examiner. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 10:09 am
His verdict in Benedi v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:48 am
Butler’s opinion was simple if not simpistic: “there is a ‘reasonable medical probability that there is a direct causal association between Mr. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:22 am
” Unless, said the court, there is clear evidence that the Legislature intended otherwise, the presumption is that all terms and conditions of employment are subject to mandatory bargaining.In addition to making the initial determination, Section 207-c gives the employer the exclusive right to appoint a physician to examine a sick or injured officer, to prescribe and provide medical or surgical treatment if indicated, and to issue an initial back-to-work order if the… [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:45 am
But as Lady Hale noted at §61 (citing Lord Steyn in R (Roberts) v Parole Board) even the most wicked of men are entitled to justice and she doubted that the appellant was the most wicked of men. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
In Messerschmidt v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 3:31 pm
On May 13, 2009, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ("TTAB") recharacterized a previously-issued opinion in its fraud jurisprudence, making it "precedential. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
Feds for Medical Freedom involve conflicting decisions of the U.S. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:07 am
(Irwin Toy Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 4:16 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:33 pm
Today we review Arenson v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm
That last case, United States v. [read post]
