Search for: "State v. Booker"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,082
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2010, 4:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 1:47 pm
Disparity in Federal Sentencing: Boston Globe staff writer Jonathan Saltzman has this article on a recent study of the widened disparity in federal sentences in light of the case United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 8:05 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 12:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm
United States (No. 09-6822) requires the Court to further sort through the implications and consequences of its landmark ruling in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 10:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 8:15 am
Booker case. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 3:29 pm
" United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:16 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
R (Booker) v NHS Oldham and Direct Line Insurance PLC [2010] EWHC 2593 (Admin)- read judgment The High Court has held that where a claimant agrees a damages settlement that includes an indemnity to fund private nursing care should existing NHS provision be withdrawn, it was unlawful for a primary care trust to cease its funding of the claimant’s care on the basis that her needs would be met through the settlement. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 10:38 am
For example, the New Jersey Supreme Court’s 20 Abbott v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 2:41 am
Supreme Court Cadder v Her Majesty’s Advocate (Scotland) [2010] UKSC 43 (26 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Constantine, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2406 (26 October 2010) T, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2439 (26 October 2010) Wakeling, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2210 (15 September 2010) Qayum, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2237 (16 September 2010) Cooper, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2335 (20 September 2010) Nuthoo, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2383… [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 12:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 1:51 pm
§ 3553(a) and United States v Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), a further reduction generally would not be appropriate. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 8:12 am
Booker (1967) 250 Cal. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 3:00 am
Indeed, ever since the Supreme Court decided Booker v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:21 pm
" See United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 4:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:41 am
" She goes on to observe that in 2005 trust was restored in the judiciary when United States v. [read post]
