Search for: "State v. Cohen"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,065
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2017, 2:26 pm
Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc., 845 A.2d 1031 (Del. 2004), and clarified prior ambiguities in Cohen v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 12:48 pm
Burke v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 1:15 am
Frank Petro has received the highest rating (A/V) from Martindale-Hubbell, the world’s foremost authority on law firm credentials (the A/V rating is only for lawyers considered the top in their field). [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 1:42 pm
A recent case of interest is that of Hlatky v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am
Gardener of counsel), and Pollack Cohen LLP, New York (Steve Cohen of counsel), for respondents. [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am
Gardener of counsel), and Pollack Cohen LLP, New York (Steve Cohen of counsel), for respondents. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 8:16 am
Barnette Supreme Court decision in Cohen v. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 7:18 am
Cohen, 173 F.3d 63 (2d Cir. 1999). [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 6:00 am
Anonymous v Anonymous 2024 NY Slip Op 05303 Decided on October 29, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 6:00 am
Anonymous v Anonymous 2024 NY Slip Op 05303 Decided on October 29, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 12:56 pm
Meland v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:12 am
” At the Associated Press, Sharon Cohen and Adam Geller recount the results of a 50-state survey assessing “how judges and prosecutors, lawmakers and parole boards are re-examining juvenile lifer cases” in the wake of recent Supreme Court decisions “find[ing] that the harshest punishments given to adults are unconstitutionally cruel and unusual when imposed on teens”; Cohen and Geller conclude that “[t]he odds of release or continued… [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:44 pm
In today’s case (Sauer v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:29 am
Further, a legal malpractice claim cannot be stated if there is no attorney-client relationship between the parties (Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 3 [1st Dept 2009], affd 14 NY3d 874 [2010]). [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:30 am
White decision, and in a 2011 decision, Thompson v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 4:13 pm
State Department. [read post]
30 May 2016, 4:05 am
Glenn Cohen, & Elizabeth Sepper eds., Cambridge Univ., 2017, Forthcoming).Kaari E. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 7:04 am
Andrew Cohen of Politics Daily explores audio recordings of several important Supreme Court cases, including Abingdon School District v. [read post]
