Search for: "State v. Community Distributors" Results 381 - 400 of 565
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2012, 11:54 am by Bexis
OK, forget the labeling, what about some other means of communication, such as “Dear Doctor” letters? [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
Without intermediaries, mass communication platforms such as the internet wouldn’t exist. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:58 am
The IPKat has an acute dislike of legal actions that look destined to fail and which unnecessarily prolong the state of hostilities between the parties. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am by Bexis
  But inadequate communication cannot be equated to conscious disregard. . . . [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by IP Dragon
 However, the anti-dilution provision of section 53 (3) (b) seems to be able to protect the communication, investment and advertising functions of a trademark. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 12:53 pm by admin
Bureau negotiates settlement with Canadian Nivea distributor over performance claims. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 12:42 pm by Steve Szentesi
Bureau negotiates settlement with Canadian Nivea distributor over performance claims. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 7:12 am by Steve Szentesi
Steel Investment Canada Case On November 24, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave in United States Steel Corporation et al. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 11:54 am by admin
Steel Investment Canada Case On November 24, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave in United States Steel Corporation et al. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 8:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Precision IBC, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 12:29 pm by Schachtman
Almost 28 years ago, the United States Department of Labor (Occupational Safety and Health Administration or OSHA) promulgated The Hazard Communication Standard. 29 C.F.R. [read post]