Search for: "State v. Copes"
Results 381 - 400
of 704
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2014, 4:20 am
In COPE v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
[v] The appearance of such proposal is that of a solution to all parts of the problem, when in fact it can have no effect upon the cost of legal advice services. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
”Jackson v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:41 am
Apparently, this provision may force information service providers to cope with the risk of their users providing themselves links to unlawful content. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:16 pm
Related Issues: PrivacyCALEAEncrypting the WebLaw Enforcement AccessSecurityRelated Cases: Bernstein v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
The oldest relist of the bunch is Cope v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 10:42 am
Carol Rosenberg of the Miami Herald publicizes the recent reveal in Obama v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
The only old relist we’re aware of from OT2013 is Cope v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 3:29 pm
Employers using or considering using health risk assessments or other wellness programs should carefully monitor a new Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) lawsuit, EEOC v. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 1:57 pm
In R (Brown) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] EWHC 3158 (Admin), at [85], it was held that s.49A (now s.149) requires the public authority to “have due regard to the need to take steps to gather relevant information in order that it can properly take steps to take into account disabled persons’ disabilities in the context of the particular function under consideration. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:55 pm
The blog is located at: http://www.rluipa-defense.com/home.cfm In American Atheists v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 2:51 pm
The case, Tatum v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:14 am
Mendip offered Mr Akerman-Livingstone permanent accommodation but he appears to have been unable to cope with what was involved. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:15 am
In American Atheists, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
In R v Lord Chancellor Ex p Witham[1998] QB 575 he noted (at 581) that “in the unwritten legal order of the British state” it is “the common law [which] continues to accord a legislative supremacy to Parliament”. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Cases like United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:30 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York rejected each of these theories, and dismissed the plaintiff’s claims in their entirety as a matter of law this past week in Dimond, et al. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 6:19 pm
Juries and Prior Convictions: Managing the Demise of the Prior Conviction Exception to Apprendi Nancy King Abstract: This essay offers a menu of procedural alternatives for coping with the potential, some would say inevitable, abandonment of the prior conviction exception to the rule in Apprendi v. [read post]
