Search for: "State v. Holmes" Results 381 - 400 of 1,522
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2018, 2:29 am
 EUIPO claimed, that the earlier mark was ‘rather “lost” in the overall impression produced by the various elements of the pattern’.Fulia markThe Court disagreed with the contested decision, the EUIPO and the interveners, stating that the mark stands out on the canvas. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 1:40 pm by John Floyd
United States:   “The door of a court is not barred because the plaintiff has committed a crime. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
That remarkable behavior is constitutional pursuant to the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 1:08 pm by The Law Office of John Guidry II
  Let’s take a look at some questionable trial practices, as found in the case of Baker v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 11:38 am by Giles Peaker
Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames London Borough Council (2009) UKHL 7. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:23 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Accordingly, the matter must be remitted to the Planning Board so that an Environmental Impact Statement may be prepared (see Matter of West Branch Conservation Assn. v Planning Bd. of Town of Clarkstown, 207 AD2d 837, 841; Matter of Holmes v Brookhaven Town Planning Bd., 137 AD2d 601, 604). [read post]