Search for: "State v. Jim"
Results 381 - 400
of 2,681
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2008, 8:25 am
Lohr, a case in which the Supreme Court rejected the preemption of state court claims arguments. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 8:25 am
Lohr, a case in which the Supreme Court rejected the preemption of state court claims arguments. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:55 am
This morning the Court issued its decision in the GPS tracking case United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 12:39 am
For example, this op ed in the WSJ attempts to challenge the constitutionality of the legal tool that civil rights activists used to dismantle Jim Crow in public schools (via Brown v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 11:51 am
But to read the entire decision, see Chaney v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:20 am
Moreover, the coverage formula is a Jim Crow anachronism; the racial gap in voter registration and turnout, for example, is lower in states originally covered by Section 5 than nationwide. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
The brief begins:Fisher v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 6:39 am
López Jiménez, The Dissolution of the Soviet Union and Complex State Construction Processes. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 12:19 pm
ADDED: "[V]ariations on the phrase have been used by politicians and states — including New Jersey, Texas, Virginia and West Virginia — to describe their own pro-business policies for at least two decades. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, [2] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to… [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:54 pm
In Bruno v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 1:36 pm
Brown v. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 11:02 am
In Fazaga v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 11:31 am
The defendant in State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:31 pm
Court of Appeals (which covers all of California) in Rizo v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:58 am
(See Swarthout v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 1:14 am
In Alabama and other former Jim Crow states, prohibitions on integration and interracial marriage have gradually been removed from the books (but Mississippi Code Ann. 37-7-329 is a nice exception). [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:14 am
In Alabama and other former Jim Crow states, prohibitions on integration and interracial marriage have gradually been removed from the books (but Mississippi Code Ann. 37-7-329 is a nice exception). [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 5:10 pm
The Eighth Circuit just issued this order in MCCL v. [read post]
