Search for: "State v. Peoples"
Results 381 - 400
of 50,058
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2024, 8:49 am
Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
See James v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Notwithstanding tobacco’s high death toll and damaging health effects, tobacco companies have survived hundreds of lawsuits challenging their promotion and distribution of a deadly drug, including Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 4:00 am
For example, the famous 1976 California Supreme Court case of Tarasoff v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:00 am
Thousands of people driving while impaired on opioids or other narcotics are attracting the attention of law enforcement. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:05 pm
District Court for the District of Oregon to dismiss Juliana v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:25 pm
See page 107 of FDA’s 1st Quarter FY2024 MDUVA V Report (here). [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:03 pm
Justice Corrigan authors a powerful opinion that holds that it's not permissible for the police to conduct a Terry stop just because someone's in a high crime area and pretending to tie his shoe behind a car in order to avoid the police, and Justice Evan authors an equally powerful concurrence (joined by a majority of the Court) that highlights the racial implications of a rule that assumes that the "normal" response to a police encounter is to welcome and/or consent to… [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:49 am
Stated that way, Section 230’s applicability is obvious. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:37 am
The next day, former president Álvaro Uribe Vélez responded, stating that the reform is not conducive to job creation and foreign investment and will affect young people adversely. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:54 am
The Act makes it unlawful for data brokers to sell, license, rent, trade, transfer, release, disclose, provide access to, or otherwise make available personally identifiable sensitive data of a United States individual (i.e., people residing in the United States) to any foreign adversary or any entity controlled by a foreign adversary. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:11 am
” O’Brien v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:04 pm
This act takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day following the expiration of the 90 days after the final adjournment of the general assembly, except that if a referendum petition is filed under section 1 (3) of Article V of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:01 pm
But students and faculty have no special or greater entitlement to protest state action or institutional decisions than anyone else in this country. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:45 pm
UC President Michael V. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:18 pm
Hart v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 8:51 am
It brings to mind a phrase that people used to say when I was in college:"Don't steal. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am
” The Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am
Health CareOne of the issues in the first Affordable Care Act case was whether Congress could use its spending power to require states to adopt more permissive requirements for people to be on Medicaid as a condition for states receiving future Medicaid payments from the federal government. [read post]