Search for: "State v. Persons "
Results 381 - 400
of 84,413
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 5:01 am
This was already the question in 1996 when [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg penned the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am
What have you personally seen on the streets of Washington, D.C.? [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:14 am
The case is entitled U.S. et al. v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) have issued a reprimand to Birmingham Children’s Trust Community Interest Company after the personal information of a child was inappropriately disclosed to another family. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Aug 29, 2023 | Could West Virginia v EPA Strengthen State Climate Laws | Scholars argue that a recent Supreme Court decision may bolster state climate lawsuits. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:01 pm
” The Supreme Court held in International Union, UAW v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 12:40 pm
Oil States Energy Servs., LLC v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 8:06 am
The State also relies on State v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am
Criminal Law: Language RightsR. v. [read post]
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm
The basis for this decision is explained in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2024, 7:41 am
Mular v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:05 pm
At the state level, an Illinois anti-doxing law took effect in January 2024, making it illegal to publish another person’s personal information without their consent online with the intent to cause bodily harm, economic injury, or emotional distress. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:47 pm
The court determined that: i) The state has a duty to inform the owners that it intends to acquire their property—a right to notice; ii) The state’s obligation to consider objections—the right to hear; iii) The state has a duty to inform its acquisition decision, ensuring the right to a reasoned decision; iv) The state has a duty to demonstrate that the acquisition is for a public cause—acquisitions should only be made for public purposes;… [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:29 pm
BrazilBig Pan Bakery v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 2:43 pm
This bill overturns the Illinois Supreme Court’s decision in Cothron v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 2:02 pm
For example, in Italian Colors Rest. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm
This week the Tenth Circuit vacates that opinion and requests supplemental briefing on how the Supreme Court's recent decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:00 am
That was the argument before the Florida Supreme Court in the case of Malicki v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 5:01 am
From Edokobi v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm
Ever since, the MC99 provisions have been an integral part of the EU legal order (C-344/04 IATA and ELFAA, para. 36), save for the provisions on cargo, for which competence rests with the EU Member States. [read post]
