Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 381 - 400
of 29,410
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2015, 1:11 pm
In Obergefell v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 3:21 pm
The petition poses these Questions Presented: Does the ripeness doctrine of Williamson County Reg’l Planning Comm’n v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:30 am
See United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 11:04 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 12:29 pm
Like here (in a case involving State Farm, no less), here and here. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:16 am
In Jones v. [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 6:05 am
In Roy v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 9:59 am
Supreme Court today denied certiorari in Gee v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 1:42 pm
As I mentioned in my Heimeshoff v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 12:17 pm
With the argument coming up next week in Moore v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 11:00 am
United States.Gill v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 11:38 am
United States and his concurring opinion in NFIB v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 2:54 am
The Court stated that a planning obligation may be entered into in circumstances which are not connected with any planning application, but that it is not lawful to restrict the commencement of development by planning obligation until the developer undertakes to make a financial contribution towards infrastructure which is unconnected with the development of the site. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 2:20 pm
(quoting Cole v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court case (Michigan v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 3:34 am
The argument yesterday morning in Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:55 am
Lord Carnwath finished by praising the judgment in Walton v The Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 44, stating that making the 2008 Act work as intended is in all our interests, and that generous rules of standing are important to provide a mechanism for listening to competing interests in national infrastructure projects. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:11 am
Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 10:40 am
The Louisiana Department of Justice plans to appeal directly to the state Supreme Court and has already asked the trial court to suspend its order pending appeal. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:47 pm
Continue reading The post Riverside v. [read post]
