Search for: "State v. Queen" Results 381 - 400 of 2,563
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2020, 8:13 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Queen, the Court reviewed the tenure of post-retirement reappointment judges of the Provincial Court (Criminal Division). [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:05 am by John-Paul Boyd, QC
” In Weir v Weir, (1986) 1 RFL (3d) 438 (BCSC), the court held that dependence arising from a “poor job market” qualified adult children for support, a conclusion that was expanded in Bruehler v Bruehler, (1985) 49 RFL (2d) 44 (BCCA) to include “a state of [economic] depression in a province. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
(See Palazzo v Conforti, 50 NYS2d 706 [Civ Ct, NY County 1944]; Singer v Reising, 154 Misc 239 [Mun Ct, Queens County 1935].) [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
(See Palazzo v Conforti, 50 NYS2d 706 [Civ Ct, NY County 1944]; Singer v Reising, 154 Misc 239 [Mun Ct, Queens County 1935].) [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ferenets v Kenworthy  2019 NY Slip Op 33751(U) November 22, 2019 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 712299/2019 Judge: Cheree A. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
The Queen’s Speech immediately before the election indicated that draft legislation would be subject to the pre-legislative scrutiny process. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 11:32 am by Giles Peaker
January – The Court of Appeal hears the Secretary of State’s appeal in JCWI v SSHoD, (first instance decision here), in which the Govt seeks to overturn the finding that the ‘right to rent’ scheme was unjustifiably discriminatory. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 2:15 pm by Cyberleagle
The YouTube and Uploaded cases (C-682/18 Petersongs v YouTube and C-683/18 Elsevier v Cyando) pending from the German Federal Supreme Court include questions around the communication to the public right, as do C-392/19 VG Bild-Kunst v Preussischer Kulturbesitz(Germany, BGH), C-442/19 Brein v News Service Europe (Netherlands, Supreme Court) and C-597/19 Mircom v Telenet (Belgium).Questions about injunctions against intermediaries are also raised in… [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 8:11 am by Dan Bressler
” “Court Permits Insurer To Appoint Counsel At Insurer’s Expense: Temple Insurance Company v Sazwan, 2018 ABQB 156” – “In 2018, the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench (Court) handed down a decision that provided a precedent for an insured to choose its preferred counsel that the insurers will have the onus of financing. [read post]