Search for: "State v. Schmidt" Results 381 - 400 of 438
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2015, 10:00 am by Anthony Zaller
  This made Steve Jobs’ email response back to Eric Schmidt infamous, which only consisted of a smiley face when he was told that the recruiter who violated the no call rule was terminated. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am by Schachtman
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am by admin
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 2:56 pm by Kevin Goldberg
(“Dick”) Schmidt, was General Counsel for the United States Information Agency (USIA). [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 10:56 am by Adam Klasfeld
Note-1: Ex-Department of Justice official Jeff Clark, who was formerly CC4, was dropped in the superseding indictment as a co-conspirator following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 10:00 am
Just as importantly, she was an evangelical who was expressly promised to the right wing to be for overturning Roe v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 7:09 am by Paul
As Jeff Jarvis put it in his post titled "The link economy v. the content economy": ... [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:39 am by Leland E. Beck
Sidebar:  The law presumes constructive knowledge of the law’s content by publication, whether the United States Code and Code of Federal Regulations. [read post]