Search for: "State v. Trader"
Results 381 - 400
of 854
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2014, 11:48 am
(Tamar Davis Larsen, et al. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 4:44 am
On the one hand, I suppose the absence of this type of litigation on behalf of the dark pool traders who were supposedly misled or abused might suggest that the traders do not feel aggrieved or at least not aggrieved enough to file a lawsuit. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:34 am
Under common law a mark is protectable through its use, or as was stated by Justice Pitney in United Drug Co v Theodore Rectans Co: "...the right to a particular mark grows out of its use, not its mere adoption; its function is simply to designate the goods as the product of a particular trader and to protect his good will against the sale of another's product as his". [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm
Missouri v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 1:56 am
That latter section does not expressly state that the opposition period cannot be extended after the fact. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm
The Harris Court cited, with approval, a 2002 traumatic cancer case, State ex rel. [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:04 pm
This stems from a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board decision in Crocker Bank v CIBC, 223 U.S.P.Q. 909 (T.T.A.B. 1984), the correctness of which is open to doubt. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm
Certain Unknown Traders in the Securities of H.J. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 8:05 am
Food and Drug Administration and state and local health departments counted 33 people from 4 states who were confirmed ill with E. coli infections after consuming Glass Onion Catering salads and wraps sold at Trader Joe’s and other retail outlets in October and November of 2013. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 2:44 pm
Stafford v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
Two Ropes & Gray LLP lawyers in New York went to prison for leaking tips to former Galleon Group LLC trader Zvi Goffer. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 12:36 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:02 am
Prigg v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:06 am
Then there’s the trader who uses the mark in Country B—potential consumer deception. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
” He also mentioned the recent decision in SEC v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 1:46 pm
Those two worlds, that of the discrete private dealer and the hurly-burly of the art world capital markets, came into sharp legal contrast in late December 2013 with the federal jury trial in Marguerite Hoffman v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 1:46 pm
Those two worlds, that of the discrete private dealer and the hurly-burly of the art world capital markets, came into sharp legal contrast in late December 2013 with the federal jury trial in Marguerite Hoffman v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 10:46 am
Those two worlds, that of the discrete private dealer and the hurly-burly of the art world capital markets, came into sharp legal contrast in late December 2013 with the federal jury trial in Marguerite Hoffman v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:00 am
On 6 February 2014, the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered its judgment in Blomqvist v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 7:58 am
Gautzsch Großhandel v Münchener Boulevard Mobel Joseph Duna,to address this question. [read post]
