Search for: "State v. W. D."
Results 381 - 400
of 5,034
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2016, 3:51 pm
Maatman Jr. and Alex W. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
In his recent decision in the case of Schoenberg v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:16 pm
From today's order and accompanying opinion in Murthy v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 7:42 am
[W]e begin our consideration of whether actual UCI existed with a presumption that the CA acted in good faith and applied the Article 25(d) criteria conscientiously. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 7:00 am
In David Paland v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 6:34 am
State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:49 am
In Bardales v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 11:20 am
App. 1, 33, 655 A.2d 1 (1995), aff'd in relevant part, 342 Md. 363, 376, 676 A.2d 65 (1996); see also Maloas v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 1:28 pm
Snyder v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 5:45 am
Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 5:54 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:55 pm
LLC v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 1:05 pm
W & O, Inc., 213 F.3d 600, 620 (11th Cir.2000). [read post]
Ninth Circuit Discusses Withdrawal Under Rule 36(b); Determines Lower Court Did Not Abuse Discretion
5 Apr 2007, 2:44 am
United States, 45 F.3d 1345, 1348 (9th Cir.1995); see also Carney v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
[…]Id. at *21 (internal citations omitted).d. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 6:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
